0%
Home / Blog / Production Methods

Composite Production Methods Compared

Composite Production Methods Compared — Zenginler İmalat

Same resin, same glass — different process, double the performance. A direct comparison of the four main composite processes.

In composites, choosing the process matters as much as choosing the material. With the same resin and the same glass, the process alone can double the fibre content, cut part weight by a third and reduce emissions tenfold.

Four Processes, One Table

CriterionHand lay-upVacuum infusionRTMPultrusion
ToolingOne open mouldOne mould + bagTwo rigid mouldsHeated steel die
Fibre content25–35%55–70%45–60%60–70%
Void content2–5%<1%<2%<1%
Finished facesOneOneTwoFull section
Part sizeSmall–very largeSmall–very largeSmall–mediumConstant section, any length
Tooling costLowestLowHighVery high
Cycle timeLongLongShortContinuous
Ideal volume1–505–500200–50,000By metreage
Operator dependencyHighModerateLowVery low
Styrene emissionHighVery lowVery lowLow

Hand Lay-Up — The Flexible Route

The oldest and most widespread process. Fabric is laid into the mould and resin worked in by roller and brush. Investment is close to zero: a mould, rollers and ventilation.

Right when: one-off or very small series, prototypes, repairs, very large and complex parts, frequent design changes.
Wrong when: weight is critical, repeatability is mandatory, volumes are high, or occupational and emission limits are tight.
Our hand lay-up service →

Vacuum Infusion — The Large and Light Route

Dry laminate under vacuum, resin drawn in. Fibre content doubles and voids effectively disappear.

Right when: yacht and boat hulls, large panels, sandwich structures, anywhere weight is critical, and where low emission is mandatory.
Wrong when: parts are very small (consumables dominate) or two finished faces are required.
Vacuum infusion in detail →

RTM — The Series Route

Resin injected between two rigid tools. Two finished faces, short cycle, tight tolerance.

Right when: medium and high volumes, panels visible on both sides, tight dimensional tolerance, parts needing embedded inserts.
Wrong when: volume is low (tooling cannot amortise) or the part is very large.
RTM in detail →

Pultrusion — The Profile Route

Continuous fibre pulled through a heated die. Constant-section profiles at very low cost per metre.

Right when: beams, columns, grating bars, cable ducts, tubes, frames — any product whose section does not change.
Wrong when: the section varies or the metreage is small.
Pultrusion in detail →

A Four-Question Selection Guide

  1. Is the section constant along the part? If yes → pultrusion.
  2. How many will be made? More than a few hundred, and medium sized → RTM.
  3. Is the part large and is weight critical? If yes → vacuum infusion.
  4. Is it a one-off, a prototype or a highly variable job? If yes → hand lay-up.

The Shift from Open to Closed Moulding

The industry is moving from open to closed moulding, driven by three forces:

  • Occupational and environmental regulation: styrene exposure limits keep tightening. Closed moulding makes ISO 45001 and ISO 14001 compliance far easier.
  • Quality expectation: OEM customers no longer accept part-to-part variation.
  • Weight targets: in both automotive and marine work, every kilogram carries a cost.

Why Having All Four Matters

Zenginler İmalat has practised hand lay-up since 1977, pultrusion since 2015 and RTM since 2016, alongside vacuum infusion — all in the same plant.

For a customer this means the part is not forced to fit a supplier's single capability: the process is chosen to suit the part. Different components within the same project can each be produced by the method best suited to them. All our production methods →

Frequently Asked Questions

There is no absolute best. Part size, volume, surface requirement, weight target and budget are weighed together. Constant sections suit pultrusion, high volumes RTM, large and light parts vacuum infusion, and one-offs hand lay-up.

No. For one-offs, prototypes, repairs and very large custom parts it remains the most flexible and economical process. In series production it is giving way to closed-mould methods.

The fibre carries the load and the resin holds it together. Raising fibre content from 30% to 60% roughly doubles strength at the same thickness while lowering weight.

Tightening styrene exposure regulation, OEM demand for repeatable quality, and weight targets. All three favour closed moulding.

Sources

The technical information in this article is compiled from the sources below. Documents and test results belonging to our company come from our own records.

  1. Composite Manufacturing Methods — Renapol Mühendislik
  2. Polymer Matrix Composites — Bartın University (PDF)
  3. Vacuum Infusion in Composite Manufacturing — Boat Builder Türkiye
  4. What Is the Pultrusion Process? — EC Kompozit

GET A QUOTE FOR YOUR PROJECT

Talk to our engineers about your composite and polyester manufacturing needs.

Get a Quote — Free Consultation